Saturday, January 31, 2009

The twenty-eighth amendment...

I don't usually favor amending the Constitution. I opposed the proposed amendment to ban flag burning. I wasn't worried about the free speech issue. I wasn't worried about any of the other concerns raised about it. Frankly, I don't care whether you burn a flag or not. Flags are cloth. If you want to burn what the flag stands for, then we need to have a conversation. Fortunately, ideas are fireproof.

Well, it's time for a new amendment. I'll let the legal eagles work out the wording but basically, I want an amendment that protects the dignity of the office of the President of the United States. With no disrespect to our president, these are the kind of things I would like to see made illegal by this amendment...

"I'll have the Barack-a-rockin' burger with a side order of Obama-rama onion rings and a large Sasha shake...."

"Celebrate this momentous moment in history by proudly wearing your Barack Obama commemorative thong...."

"You can relive that great moment in history each time you wipe with Barack Obama toilet paper. One side of each sheet is imprinted with the smiling face of our president and the other side contains a pithy quote from his historic campaign. If you order now, you will also receive a roll of Barack Obama paper towel and box of Barack Obama facial tissue. Imagine the pride you will feel each time you wipe up a spill or blow your nose."

I think you're getting the idea here. I've seen Barack Obama's face on everything from tote bags to cigarette lighters.

Barack Obama and his accomplishments are certainly something to be commemorated. However, one must not forget that he is the sitting president. The office deserves respect as does the person who holds the office so long as the person does not completely abdicate such respect. [insert your own Bill Clinton oral sex or cigar joke or George Bush verbal floundering joke here] There needs to be some restraint before the nightly news brings me photos of the Barack Obama crack pipe.

This just might mean that bloggers can no longer add horns and sinister mustache to a picture of the president and claim that they are actually the devil. That's tough. We can live without it. There can still be plenty of constructive criticism as well as downright distaste with this amendment. Someone, somewhere will likely have to give up their plans to market a line of Barack Obama Commemorative Feminine Hygiene Products.






Technorati Tags:
, , , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Friday, January 30, 2009

Your local schools could be run by myspace...

myspace school.jpeg


Well-Connected Parents Take On School Boards: Web-Savvy Activists Push For Educational Change. Parents are using the power of the Internet and social networking communities to effect changes in their school. I will use Clint Eastwood terms to explain this phenomenon.

The Good

1. Parents have meaningful input for the schools their children attend. They have a vested interest and, more often than not, they want what is best for their children. The parents who want good grades handed to them whether or not they actually earned them are an irritating but small minority.

2. Education can be a somewhat insular institution. Forces from within (the students themselves) and from without (No Child Left Behind) draw attention inward.

3. Parents will usually be more supportive of a school that is responsive to their needs.

The Bad

1. Education is a unique institution. There is this odd belief that because one attends school for thirteen years from kindergarten through high school, they are educational experts. I know better than this.

-I go to the dentist regularly. I don't think I'm an oral hygienist.
-I can tell time. I don't think I can build or repair a clock.
-I can eat. I can guarantee you I'm no chef.
-I can read and write. I'm not an English teacher nor could I be one.

I will continue to support this grassroots effort in school districts until it goes too far. Order of curriculum, for example, should really be left to educators.

2. Groups have the potential to become mobs. Watch out for it.

The Ugly

C'mon, folks! If all the social networking tools on the web were a human body, myspace would be an ass pimple. Parents would be much more effective with Facebook. Hell, they'd be more effective with Twitter.




Technorati Tags:
, , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

I don't even know where to start with this one...

football yawn.jpeg


Disclaimer 1: This article promotes neither the pro-choice nor pro-life movement. Try to follow the bouncing ball.


Disclaimer 2: I have two dogs and adore them. I openly do not support the organization PETA although I oppose those who mistreat animals. PETA and I draw the line of what constitutes mistreatment in two very different places. I like steak and chicken. If you kick your dog or cat, I think I should get to hit you in the face with a baseball bat. People who starve their animals and leave them locked in cages with their own waste for weeks on end should have to suffer the same fate for however long they may survive. That should give you a general idea of the difference.


Disclaimer 3: I don't care as much about the Super Bowl as a pig does about Sunday. The best thing to ever happen as a result of the Super Bowl is the movie Black Sunday.


The Super Bowl people turned down an ad which promotes the pro-life cause on the grounds that they have decided not to air political or advocacy ads. I don't know if that reason is bull or not. I also don't care.

I'm glad they're not airing the commercial because, and only because, I hate poorly supported arguments. The ad outlines the life of Barack Obama and then points out that despite all this hardship, he grows up to become the first African-American president of the United States. The supposed moral of this story: no matter how hard the child's life may be, abortion isn't a good choice because you don't know what the child may go on to do. I've heard this one before except in that story you're killing Ludwig von Beethoven by choosing abortion.

The trick with these stories is to paint a bleak picture of what a child's future would look like if born. The idea being that when someone says, "Do you think this is a good case for abortion," they can spring the end of the story on you. This is an unconvincing argument for the following reason...

Child is going to be born into a violent family situation and have a difficult childhood. Good case for abortion? No? Damn! You just missed killing Adolf Hitler.

What about the child who is born to an young, unwed mother but eventually has a stable childhood including a step family and strong church involvement? The child is shy and awkward but does graduate high school and go on to college. Are you convinced an abortion is a good idea here? Pity! Ted Bundy lives on.

The argument isn't bad, it's just very weak. It invites being shot full of holes. Both sides of this debate have significantly better arguments in their arsenal. This argument is like marching toward a machine gun nest with nothing but a pitchfork.

This story has another side.

The organization that tried to get this ad aired became irritated when the Super Bowl people said they would air an ad by PETA if they would tone down the sexuality of the ad. There goes no advocacy ads. The PETA ad is stupid. It's 30 seconds of my life I'll never get back and I resent it even more than the two hours I lost watching Fight Club. Find it on YouTube yourself. I'm not even posting a link. The part that bugged me was when Brian Burch, who favored the pro-life ad said, "NBC claims it doesn’t allow advocacy ads, but that’s not true. They were willing to air an ad by PETA if they would simply tone down the sexual suggestiveness. Our ad is far less provocative, and hardly controversial by comparison,”

Burch is absolutely right. The Obama-fetus ad is far less sexually provocative than the PETA ad. Burch is absolutely wrong. The Obama-fetus ad is far more controversial. Let's check the scorecard.

How many times has someone tried to damage or destroy an abortion clinic?
How many times has someone tried to damage or destroy a vegetarian restaurant?
How many doctors who work at abortion clinics been assaulted or killed?
How many chefs who work at vegetarian restaurants been assaulted or killed?

Who dislikes each other more, the people on either side of the pro-choice, pro-life debate or the carnivores vs. the vegetarians?

Mr. Burch, the ad for which you advocate touches a much hotter topic.

A note from the author...

Dear Gentle Reader,

I do not advocate violence being done to those who are pro-choice or pro-life. I do not favor violence being done to either people who eat animal products or people who don't eat animal products. I do not advocate violence being done to the place any of these people work or live.

Furthermore, I do not advocate hitting a person who abuses an animal with a baseball bat. If a baseball bat is unavailable, a golf club, tennis racquet, or axe handle will suffice nicely.

Sincerely,

Gridlock Reigns signature.jpeg


This post is based on the article, NBC rejects anti-abortion Super Bowl ad that features Obama as unborn child found on the website therawstory dated Friday, January 30, 2009.





Technorati Tags:
, , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

The Number 23...

Virginia Madsen.jpg


I watched The Number 23 today. I won't be running to the store to buy the DVD so I can watch it over and over again. But I'm glad I watched it for several reasons.

1. Virginia Madsen is in it. She is on my list of five. She's #1 in case you're curious.

2. Jim Carrey was in it. I don't like Jim Carrey except in movies where he isn't always the stereotypical Jim Carrey. This movie really showed his range, even more so than The Truman Show.

3. It wasn't one of those, "There's two hours of my life that I'll never get back," movies of which they make way too many.




Technorati Tags:
, , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Three short months later...

Free Printable Calendar _ 2008 Calendar.jpeg


It has been three short months since I had the idea, "Hey, wouldn't it be fun to have a blog." I was motivated by a friend who keeps a couple of blogs of her own. Let's just say I wanted to be cool like her. And pale imitation is the greatest form of chasing but not catching cool.

It's been an interesting experience so far to say the least. Most of the time, it's fun. Sometimes it's a little hard to find something about which I'd like to write. Usually I find it a challenge to put into words what I am really thinking. Challenges are good things. They exercise the mind. Besides, since I can't actually reach out and shake anyone by the collar until they come to their senses without an assault charge or the wrath of the secret service, it's better that I blog.

In this first three months, I have written forty-four blog entries. This works out to about one every other day. This means sometimes I wrote two in a day because there are stretches without many entries. I call that stretch December.

Most of my entries have been on topic. A few have strayed. Some are serious. Some aren't. A few are really good. Most are, generously speaking, just fair.

Google Analytics tells me that I have had 141 unique visitors to my website. It also tells me that the average time on my site is just over four minutes. This means that most of these people came to my site, realized it wasn't what they were looking for, and moved on. Most people visit my site only once. I'm far from surprised.

During my blogging time, I have watched some interesting treads in politics.

1. Since I've been watching politics more carefully and reading a little more for blog fodder, I've noticed how much things are really the same since my first interest in politics during the Reagan/Mondale election. Different names but basically the same bread and circuses.

2. I've watched Barack Obama go from being a foregone conclusion to being our first African-American president.

3. I've watched the Democratic Party avoid their mistakes at the beginning of the Clinton administration and not act like children in an unsupervised candy store. Time will tell how long this lasts. Both parties tend toward this effect if they win big. The longer they can stay away from it, the longer they'll remember why they got tired of the republicans.

4. I've watched the Republican Party begin the slow, painful journey from the party of, "Put the flag and the match down and back away slowly," and, "Just what are you doing in that bedroom," to the party of low taxes and small government that tends to be what resonates with voters when they get tired of the democrats.

5. I've watched yet another change of parties in the White House herald a new era. Later on I'll be able to point out that, yet again, it didn't happen. When will people realize that our government system in its current form is designed from the ground up for business as usual and change is not going to come from one person, even the one at the top?

blogging.jpg


Despair, Inc. has so many wise things to say in poster, et. al. form.

After three months, I feel it is time to evaluate the reason for which I write this blog. I enjoy writing this blog whether or not anyone is actually reading it. I confess to being jazzed that people are actually finding it regardless of whether or not they stay to read it. I plan to continue trying to find someone who will stop long enough to read and understand that there aren't going to be any great things coming from government until there is a fundamental change in the people who make up the government. As long as our government is comprised of politicians, we're doomed to the same old, same old.

I'll continue to write about other things as they interest me so nobody can read about that as well.

I promise I won't put things in my blog just to drive traffic to my site, rather like when John Dvorak says something uncomplimentary about Apple, Inc. just to draw hits to his website.

That said, and as a parting comment...

Barack Obama Sucks...

Barack Obama sucks popsicles because no matter how well one cares for their teeth, most adults have some sensitivity to cold and therefore most don't bite and chew popsicles.

Barack Obama sucks Tootsie Pops because that's how suckers are supposed to be consumed.

Barack Obama sucks honeycrisp apples when he bites into them because they are extraordinarily juicy.

Barack Obama sucks beverages through a straw when he uses a straw because that's just how they work.

Barack Obama sucks air into his lungs because air contains the vital component, oxygen.



Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , , , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

I'm glad I didn't go...

freezing man.jpg


Nancy Franklin wrote an article for the New Yorker called, "A Place Called Hope." The article discusses the wall to wall, ceiling to floor, end to end, from here to there coverage the cable news networks gave the inauguration of Barack Obama. Her premise was, for everything she was able to see with the TV coverage, she felt disconnected from it by distance. Her article ends with, "By watching it on TV, I’d missed it."

I watched Obama being sworn into office. I had no intention of watching his address as I mentioned in a previous post. I'm glad those who wanted to go went. I feel badly for those, like Franklin, who wished they had gone and didn't for whatever reason. I watched history as it was made. I watched it on television. I'm glad I did.

Here's what I did not miss by choosing TV over the 20 minute car ride, a metro ride, and a two mile walk. Yes, I live that close.

1. Cold for which even my midwestern blood is not equipped.
2. Long lines at the portapotty for which my aging bladder is ill equipped.
3. A dearth of hot coffee which I refuse to even imagine.
4. Long periods of standing to which my flat feet would react badly.
5. Extremely large crowds which make me uncomfortable.
6. An opportunity to read the inaugural address instead of not hearing it well over a public address system.

and finally...

7. All that political commentary that I find so very funny.

If I had a machine to travel through time, I would take Ms. Franklin back and she could take another swing at going to the inauguration. As it stands, I can't. At least not yet...





Technorati Tags:
, , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Monday, January 26, 2009

Terrorists have learned the lessons of American politics well...

sticks and stones.jpg


Since 9/11, al-Queda has not had a successful attack in the United States. Since terrorist isn't working out so well for them, they are taking a swing at being politicians. Lacking anything substantive, al-Queda has resorted to hurling insults at President Obama. I won't dignify what they're saying by repeating any of it.

What strikes me about this is that if these people were politicians, this would be called a smear campaign. It would be spoken poorly of in the press but would be reported on as a legitimate tool of a campaign. As it stands, they are nothing but terrorists looking to gain some support. They don't balk at the free press either.

I don't think politicians are terrorists. I don't think terrorists are politicians. I think both choose the same tactics for not terribly dissimilar reasons.




Technorati Tags:
, , , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Experience apparently outweighs paying your taxes on time...

1040 oops.jpg


The Senate confirmed Timothy Geithner. Apparently, the Senate was impressed with his experience enough to overlook his shortcomings with the 1040 form.

Experience is not to be overlooked. However, experience is not always a good qualifier. I have a lot of experience at Desktop Tower Defense. I've spent more hours than I would care to admit with the game. After all this "experience" with the game, I still can't beat the blasted thing on the hard difficulty level.

When you permit yourself to be considered for Treasury Secretary, you are choosing the expert level of play. Experience is one thing. Ability is another. Let's hope his tax shortcomings are not an indication of his ability.




Technorati Tags:
, ,


Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Even Executive Orders Can Be Ruined by Politics...

seal of president.jpg


Have you ever read an executive order? I haven't until just today. They have their own section on the White House's website.

Obama issued two executive orders on his first full day as president. He didn't issue any on the 20th. Apparently the parties kept him busy.

The first one was on Presidential Records. Apparently they're all public now and can't be un-public-ed. It took a lot of words to say that and frankly, once I started reading it, my head began to hurt. Apparently I can't handle political doublespeak.

The second order was an ethics pledge that new appointees must take. It lists a pile of things that appointees can't do. It seems designed to keep current and former appointees from using their current and former appointments for personal gain. It sounds really good until you read section three. The text appears below.

Sec. 3. Waiver.

(a) The Director of the Office of Management and Budget, or his or her designee, in consultation with the Counsel to the President or his or her designee, may grant to any current or former appointee a written waiver of any restrictions contained in the pledge signed by such appointee if, and to the extent that, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, or his or her designee, certifies in writing (i) that the literal application of the restriction is inconsistent with the purposes of the restriction, or (ii) that it is in the public interest to grant the waiver. A waiver shall take effect when the certification is signed by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget or his or her designee.

(b) The public interest shall include, but not be limited to, exigent circumstances relating to national security or to the economy. De minimis contact with an executive agency shall be cause for a waiver of the restrictions contained in paragraph 3 of the pledge.


Read it carefully. This is loophole that you could fly a zeppelin through.

Politics can take the best intentioned idea and completely render it irrelevant. Q.E.D.




Technorati Tags:
, ,


Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, January 24, 2009

Barack Obama intends to EXTERMINATE...

That's it! I have had it. I hate politicians and am now resoundingly reminded why. I tried to be fair and even handed and point out how the opposition was wrong and stupid to think that Obama wasn't president. But now I guess I have to regret that action.

My new washingtonpost.com widget has just showed me the headline, "Jarrett Will Represent Obama in Davros..." something. I guess the widget cuts off the end of long titles. I'm sure it ends with something like alliance, or union, or his swearing unwavering loyalty. It's just terrible.

Davros.jpg

I don't know who this Jarrett person is I know who Davros is. Davros is the Kaled from the planet Skaro. He is an evil genius who created the Daleks. He is a homicidal maniac, a meglomaniac, insane, and any other really, really bad thing you can think of off the top of your head. And Obama is in league with him or soon will be.





Daleks.jpg


Davros' creation, the Daleks, are one of the most fear terrors in the universe. Their quest for domination of the universe and the destruction of everything they consider less perfect than themselves. Apparently Obama intends rid the world of everybody but himself and those he considers worthy of survival. Well, we now know what our president truly has in mind for us.



Oh, wait a minute. It's not Davros, it's Davos. No "r". Hold on a sec. Maybe I should read the article after all. Please hold.





Back.

Davos is apparently a city in Switzerland. Jarrett is a friend of Obama. He's sending her, probably at great expense, to some World Economic Forum where a bunch of rich people get together. That's just great. A bunch of rich people mixed with politicians sitting around planning out what they think is best for us.



It's even worse than I thought.




Technorati Tags:
, , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, January 22, 2009

For once and for all, Obama has been president since his first swing at the oath of office on Tuesday...

constitution.jpg


I want to settle this once and for all since my favorite source of news, Stephen Colbert, messed it up. I'm seeing news figures like Colbert and the unfunny ones mess this up since Tuesday.

First, we need to be clear on one point. Yes, he did need to take the oath. The Constitution requires it, period. Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution states:

Before he enters on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation: -- "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

That should settle it. The Constitution says it and that has not been superseded by any of the amendments.

Second, Obama retook the oath because it was prudent, although entirely unnecessary. It eliminates distracting discussion. There is no place in the Constitution that says his election is invalid because he didn't get it perfect the first time. He got it perfect the second time. Case closed.

Third, the Constitution does not specify that a Bible must be used in the ceremony. Obama didn't use one the second time around and it doesn't matter. He didn't need to use one. Lyndon Johnson, perhaps in haste, took the oath with his hand on a Roman missal upon the death of John F. Kennedy. A Roman missal isn't even considered a sacred book by Catholics. Nevertheless, Johnson was president.

twentieth amendment section 1.jpg


Fourth, and this is where Colbert blew it and prompted this entry. There is no place in the Constitution that indicates a time when the President-elect poofs and becomes President. The oft misquoted twentieth amendment specifies the end of a presidential term, not the beginning of one. If you don't understand this, go back and reread my first point.

Fifth, and don't underestimate the importance of this, Obama is not the first president to have a do over of the oath. Both Chester A. Arthur and Calvin Coolidge repeated the oath after the first taking. Both of these men were our president during their term of office.

Did Obama mess up the oath the first time? Yes.
Did it prevent Obama from assuming the presidency? No.
Did he get the oath right the second time? Yes.
Did he legally need to retake the oath? No.
Was retaking the oath the right move? Yes.
Did he need a bible for the do over? No.

Barack Obama is the sitting president of the United States. He has been since he flubbed the oath a minute or so after noon on Tuesday. Now get over it.




Technorati Tags:
, , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

An inaugural speech breakdown...

Below is Barack Obama's inaugural speech. My comments are placed inline.

My fellow citizens:

I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.

He didn't sacrifice the dignity of his position just to make some snide comment about his predecessor. I thought this was classy.



Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath.

Forty-three Americans have taken the presidential oath. Barack Obama is the forty-fourth president, however Grover Cleveland's two terms as president are broken up by the presidency of Benjamin Harrison. Therefore, Cleveland is both our 22nd and 24th president. He does not, however, count as two Americans. Barack Obama is the 44th president and the 43rd American to take the oath.



The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often, the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because we the people have remained faithful to the ideals of our forebears and true to our founding documents.

So it has been. So it must be with this generation of Americans.

It would have better been stated, "America has carried on usually in spite of those in high office. It has been because we the people have remained faithful to the ideals...."



That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our nation is at war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age. Homes have been lost, jobs shed, businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly, our schools fail too many, and each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet.

There's a lot of obvious in this paragraph. The truth here is buried in the middle. The words, "our collective failure," carries in it a lot of truth. Americans not only have problems, Americans are the problem. As a country, we have to make some hard decisions and it would be wise if we didn't leave these decisions to our elected representatives (i.e. politicians). We need to force these people to represent us and our best interests and not just blandly sit back and say, "The government will take care of us."



These are the indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable, but no less profound, is a sapping of confidence across our land, a nagging fear that America's decline is inevitable, that the next generation must lower its sights.

It was very smart to not say that we must lower our sights. That was Carter's line. History does not remember him kindly for it.



Today I say to you that the challenges we face are real, they are serious and they are many. They will not be met easily or in a short span of time. But know this, America: They will be met.

On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord.

It's not bad material but it's just rhetoric.



On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn-out dogmas that for far too long have strangled our politics.

Good luck with that. We've heard it before. It hasn't happened yet. If you can pull it off, then you are the miracle worker that some say you are.



We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.

A better rewording: Time to get up off your collective behind and start holding our feet to the fire. Make your representatives actually represent you. Vote us out of office when we engage in the usual politics. Call for our removal from office when we do something stupid. Don't let us be the idiots we've been for far too long.



By the way, there are a slew of other countries that are younger than we are. In the great scheme of the world, we're closer to middle aged.



In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of shortcuts or settling for less. It has not been the path for the fainthearted, for those who prefer leisure over work or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things -- some celebrated, but more often men and women obscure in their labor -- who have carried us up the long, rugged path towards prosperity and freedom.

What I said in the last paragraph I'm just rephrasing here.



For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled across oceans in search of a new life.

For us, they toiled in sweatshops and settled the West, endured the lash of the whip and plowed the hard earth.

For us, they fought and died in places like Concord and Gettysburg, Normandy and Khe Sahn.

Time and again, these men and women struggled and sacrificed and worked till their hands were raw so that we might live a better life. They saw America as bigger than the sum of our individual ambitions, greater than all the differences of birth or wealth or faction.

When you want to inspire people, talk about the people who came before us.



This is the journey we continue today. We remain the most prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Our workers are no less productive than when this crisis began. Our minds are no less inventive, our goods and services no less needed than they were last week or last month or last year. Our capacity remains undiminished. But our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions -- that time has surely passed. Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off and begin again the work of remaking America.

The first half is a three-syllable chantable: U.S.A.! U.S.A.!
The second half: Brace yourself for I have big ideas. Fear not, they'll get lost in that partisan bickering I said was coming to an end.



For everywhere we look, there is work to be done. The state of our economy calls for action bold and swift. And we will act not only to create new jobs but to lay a new foundation for growth. We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together. We will restore science to its rightful place and wield technology's wonders to raise health care's quality and lower its costs. We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories. And we will transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age. All this we can do. All this we will do.

OK, let's break this down. We're going to do something hasty, and probably ill-advised, to fix the economy (you know how government works). Then we're going to be Romans. The Romans were great road builders. I suppose if there was electricity and Internet in Julius Caesar's time, it would have been really great too. Then we are going to be like a cheesy 1950's science fiction movie and employ super science to solve our problems. Then we're going to add a solar panel, a sail, and some potting soil to our cars. Finally, we're going to get a new buggy whip and see if we can't get just a few more laps out of the dead horse that is our educational system.



Now, there are some who question the scale of our ambitions, who suggest that our system cannot tolerate too many big plans. Their memories are short, for they have forgotten what this country has already done, what free men and women can achieve when imagination is joined to common purpose and necessity to courage.

It was not so terribly long ago that this nation mobilized its full efforts to achieve a goal. Why did we work so hard to put a man on the moon? Boy, did we love Kennedy. Shortly before that, we mobilized our full efforts to achieve another goal. Why did we work so hard to win World War II? Boy, were we pissed off about Pearl Harbor. And boy, we really hated Nazis. What's going to be our big motivator this time? Boy, we really miss easily obtainable consumer credit?



What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them, that the stale political arguments that have consumed us for so long no longer apply. The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works, whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified. Where the answer is yes, we intend to move forward. Where the answer is no, programs will end. And those of us who manage the public's knowledge will be held to account, to spend wisely, reform bad habits and do our business in the light of day, because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.

Cynic is a term invented by idealists to insult realists. You're overstating here, Mr. President. The ground hasn't shifted yet. I do not underestimate the position you have in history. You have a real shot here. You could fix this political system that can only be described as busted. Your election didn't cause this. Neither did your inauguration. Your actions going forward might be worthy of this paragraph.



Nor is the question before us whether the market is a force for good or ill. Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched. But this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control. The nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous. The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our gross domestic product, but on the reach of our prosperity; on the ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart -- not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good.

Yes, the market is good. A watchful eye is good too. A too watchful eye can be stifling. Let's not go overboard on this one.



As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our Founding Fathers, faced with perils that we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake. And so, to all other peoples and governments who are watching today, from the grandest capitals to the small village where my father was born: Know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and we are ready to lead once more.

Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use. Our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.

We are the keepers of this legacy; guided by these principles once more, we can meet those new threats that demand even greater effort, even greater cooperation and understanding between nations. We'll begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people and forge a hard-earned peace in Afghanistan. With old friends and former foes, we'll work tirelessly to lessen the nuclear threat and roll back the specter of a warming planet. We will not apologize for our way of life; nor will we waver in its defense. And for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken. You cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you.

I've heard most of this before. Several times. I'd quote it but I'm too tired to chase down citations for my déjà vu.



For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus, and nonbelievers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth. And because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace.

If we're not going to be a melting pot anymore, could we at least find a better term than patchwork?



To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect. To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict or blame their society's ills on the West, know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy. To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history, but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.

Please remember the phrase, "Easier said than done," before you get too far into this.



To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to make your farms flourish and let clean waters flow; to nourish starved bodies and feed hungry minds. And to those nations like ours that enjoy relative plenty, we say we can no longer afford indifference to the suffering outside our borders, nor can we consume the world's resources without regard to effect. For the world has changed, and we must change with it.

This is ambitious.



As we consider the road that unfolds before us, we remember with humble gratitude those brave Americans who, at this very hour, patrol far-off deserts and distant mountains. They have something to tell us, just as the fallen heroes who lie in Arlington whisper through the ages. We honor them not only because they are guardians of our liberty, but because they embody the spirit of service: a willingness to find meaning in something greater than themselves. And yet, at this moment, a moment that will define a generation, it is precisely this spirit that must inhabit us all.

God bless our troops.



For as much as government can do and must do, it is ultimately the faith and determination of the American people upon which this nation relies. It is the kindness to take in a stranger when the levees break, the selflessness of workers who would rather cut their hours than see a friend lose their job, which sees us through our darkest hours. It is the firefighter's courage to storm a stairway filled with smoke, but also a parent's willingness to nurture a child, that finally decides our fate.

Our challenges may be new, the instruments with which we meet them may be new, but those values upon which our success depends -- honesty and hard work, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism -- these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history. What is demanded then is a return to these truths. What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility -- a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation and the world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character than giving our all to a difficult task.

This is the price and the promise of citizenship.

This is the source of our confidence: the knowledge that God calls on us to shape an uncertain destiny.

This is the meaning of our liberty and our creed, why men and women and children of every race and every faith can join in celebration across this magnificent Mall. And why a man whose father less than 60 years ago might not have been served at a local restaurant can now stand before you to take a most sacred oath.

So let us mark this day in remembrance of who we are and how far we have traveled. In the year of America's birth, in the coldest of months, a small band of patriots huddled by nine campfires on the shores of an icy river. The capital was abandoned. The enemy was advancing. The snow was stained with blood. At a moment when the outcome of our revolution was most in doubt, the father of our nation ordered these words be read to the people:

"Let it be told to the future world that in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive, that the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to meet it."

America, in the face of our common dangers, in this winter of our hardship, let us remember these timeless words; with hope and virtue, let us brave once more the icy currents, and endure what storms may come; let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested, we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back nor did we falter; and with eyes fixed on the horizon and God's grace upon us, we carried forth that great gift of freedom and delivered it safely to future generations.

Thank you. God bless you. And God bless the United States of America.

Most of the rest of this is fluffy rhetoric. It's respectable fluffy rhetoric, but it is nevertheless fluffy.



For all the fun I had poking at this speech, it was a good speech. It wasn't all fluffy rhetoric. I can forgive some fluff because it can't be avoided. It's an occupational hazard. It would have been a great speech if it went just one step further by not only pointing to Americans as the problem, but pointing to Americans as complicit in the biggest problem with this country, the American political system and the politicians that comprise it.






Technorati Tags:
,


Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Thank you, President Bush...

George W. Bush.jpg


Dear Mr. Bush,

I want to take this time to thank you for following an important tradition of your 42 predecessors. Unlike too many other world leaders, you did not call out the military at the end of your term of office, explaining that there were a few important items that needed tending and only you could handle them followed by a vague promise of a return to free elections soon.

There are those who would snivel that if you had called the army out, you are so unpopular that they would not have heeded your call. That may or may not be true. It is also not the point. You didn't make the call and for that I am grateful.

While you're following the traditions set forth by your predecessors, please read my earlier post and retire completely to private life. Show up for state events to which you are invited, smile, wave, look dignified but not bored (I know that's hard) and then go home.

Respectfully,

Gridlock Reigns signature.jpeg



Gridlock Reigns




Technorati Tags:
,


Sphere: Related Content

Barack Obama should not be our first African-American president (and other rants)...

our new president button.jpg


This transition of power irritated me on so many levels. I didn't watch a lot of the lead-up coverage. I did watch him being sworn in. I didn't watch his speech. I read it later for the same reason I don't watch Steve Jobs' keynotes. I don't want the content colored by the delivery. That was about all I could take of spectacle. My irritation kept me from most of the event. Here's what bothers me about the whole deal.



Where's the outrage that he's our first African-American president?

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is 45 years old (or will be on its birthday this July. The Thirteenth Amendment was ratified 99 years before that. That's 144 years during which the fine people of the United States couldn't get their act together and get over race-based bigotry. I'm an American. I'm proud I'm an American. But I'm not ashamed to say that we have a large, hairy wart on our nose.

That said, Barack Obama should not be our first African-American president. He should be our second, perhaps our third, African-American president.

Could we possibly have commercialized this a little bit more?

Is there anything on which imprinting our president's face is beneath dignity? I am proud to say that I have not joined the throngs of people who bought anything they could lay their hand on that had Obama's face on it. I don't have a picture of Obama as the wallpaper on my iPhone. That is reserved for my dogs (a fact that has not escaped the attention of my wife). I don't have the canvas bag that they sold at the National Mall with a big picture of Obama on it. The Franklin Mint should not expect a call from me. If offered, I will not be purchasing the Barack Obama commemorative paper towels or toilet paper if anyone is stupid enough and offensive enough to make them. However, I'm certain that many will be purchasing the official Obama Inauguration Certificate of Attendance for only $14.95. Now the ad in the Washington Post says they're $19.95. That's awfully quick to lower the price. I don't think they're selling like hot cakes. Perhaps they should have followed Geico's example and gotten Mrs. Butterworth to sponsor the product.

More people need to recognize what's really going on here?

George Bush is a very unpopular president for reasons he both does and does not deserve. However, what we should be celebrating here is not that Barack Obama has come to save us all from all the evils visited upon us by former president Bush. What we are celebrating here is that the United States has finally elected the best candidate in spite of the color of his skin. We have our first African-American president...finally! Let's not overstate what's happening here because the expectations of this man are outgrowing what any person could possibly fulfill. Please realize that Barack Obama is a human being working within a broken system. The expectations of him are growing into a gigantic letdown later on down the road.

Why are people pinning so many of their hopes on this man?

Think back to all of the best things that happened in your life? I think back on mine. There was meeting and marrying my wife. There was the day I got my first job. There was the birth of my niece and nephew. There were a lot of other things and what makes them all alike is that none of them emanated from government. I bet if you think back, you'll find the same thing to be true.

Did we forget he's a politician?

My feelings on politicians are sufficiently well explained in this blog. I respect the man for his accomplishments. I respect him in the office he holds because he is the president. I have no respect for his chosen profession. He has chosen a path that requires him to promise many things. These promises break down as follows:

70%: Never had any intention of pursuing these promises.

10%: Would like to do but will get killed because he has 535 other politicians, lobbyists, and worst of all, his own party leadership to deal with.

10%: Will get accomplished but will be so mutilated by pork, compromise, concessions, and the usual machinations of politics.

10%: Won't have time for because he'll only be president eight years.





I hope Obama is a successful president. We can't afford a failure. In the end, no matter how successful he is, he will likely be like any other president. He will be blamed things he didn't cause. He will be credited for things he didn't accomplish. The distant eyes of history will look upon him differently than we will during the next eight years. Just don't expect miracles. They don't come from Washington.





Technorati Tags:
, , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Monday, January 19, 2009

Barack Obama needs to eat more meals with his children...

Obama family.jpg


In the January 18, 2009 issue of Parade Magazine, Barack Obama shares with the world (or at least Parade Magazine's readership and those who find the article reprinted on the web) a letter to his children, Malia and Sasha.

I think an article in the Columbia Journalism Review really hit the nail on the head. The article point specifically to the third from last paragraph of the letter. It is quoted below for the convenience of the one person who might accidently read this.

"I hope both of you will take up that work, righting the wrongs that you see and working to give others the chances you’ve had. Not just because you have an obligation to give something back to this country that has given our family so much—although you do have that obligation. But because you have an obligation to yourself. Because it is only when you hitch your wagon to something larger than yourself that you will realize your true potential."

While you're at it girls, could you possibly invent faster than light travel and overcome Newton's first law?

While suggesting a parent has made an error in the way they deal with their children is treacherous ground at best, when one purposefully makes their parenting a matter of public record, it invites comment and criticism. This is a lot to place on the shoulders of two girls who aren't even in high school yet. However bright, energetic, and intelligent they may be (I'm assuming very to all three since I don't know), let them be children before they are expected to tackle the problems of the world.

So, Malia and Sasha, my unsolicited advice is this... Before you hitch yourself to the great train America, please take the time to do the following...

Read some books that interest you.

Learn long division if you haven't already.

Have a crush.

Frantically collect something that you will lose interest in next month.

You get the idea. I'm sure you'll be better than I at coming up with a few more to enjoy. And please enjoy them. Childhood, for all its heartaches and pitfalls, is precious and short.


Photo by Callie Shell




Technorati Tags:
, , , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, January 18, 2009

On Apple Computer...

Steve Jobs macbook air.jpg


There has been a lot of press regarding Apple's Steve Jobs since he announced his leave of absence.

There are three central questions that have been flying about since this happened.

1. Was Steve Jobs' health a private matter and not anyone's business?

2. Can Apple continue without Steve Jobs?

3. Will Apple go out of business after Steve Jobs?

The answer to these questions is, "No, yes, and probably, respectively." Let me explain why.

Let me break it down for you.

Is Steve Jobs health a private matter?

Steve Jobs is the founder and CEO of Apple Computer. He is widely recognized as a driving force at Apple Computer as well as one of the greatest pitch men in the industry. Most importantly, Apple is a publicly held company. The health of such an integral member of its management is a matter of public interest.

Disclosure: I own Apple Stock.

Can Apple continue without Steve Jobs?

Apple has 23 billion dollars in cash. It has no debt. Children practically pop out of the womb wanting an iPod. Apple has a sufficiently deep bench to prevent Apple from being a one act circus. Johnathan Ive is still there. He's the guy who gave us the iPod, et. al.

Will Apple go out of business after Steve Jobs?

I'm sure at some point in the future, Apple Computer will close its doors. I couldn't tell you why. Maybe it will be after the war with the super intelligent computers when we decide nobody should make computers anymore. Who knows? On the other hand, maybe Steve Jobs is like the Dread Pirate Roberts. Maybe every few years somebody new is dressed up in a black turtleneck and Apple will live forever. I actually stole that idea from Andy Ihnatko. I wish I had thought of it but didn't.

I lived through a decade where it wasn't easy being an Apple user. The company was mismanaged. The product line was downright byzantine. Everyone said that Apple would be gone in a year. I survived that round of incorrect speculation. I'll make it through this one. So will Apple.

Image of Steve Jobs by Matthew Yohe





Technorati Tags:
,


Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Settling in for a long inauguration weekend nap...

Dachshund Afternoon

I live in the vicinity of Washington D.C. At least, I live between the National Mall and the most distant hotel that charged an exorbitant rate and required a four night stay. I thought it might be a good idea to steer clear of the crowds. I don't do crowds. So I've stocked the homestead with food, got a old TV miniseries on TV, and settled in for a quiet weekend. One way or another, I think the best seat to watch the inauguration will be in the living room. My living room has recliners that look a lot more comfortable than the folding chairs they are setting out. My living room is looking to also be about 30 degrees warmer.




"Nobody goes there no more; it's too crowded!"

Yogi Berra

I've been mildly worried in the back of my head that turnout for this historic inauguration may be curtailed by the stories of just how many people are rumored to be attending. It probably won't turn out that way. At any rate, the mild concern reminded me of a Yogi Berra quote of which I'm quite fond.



"The vulgar crowd values friends according to their usefulness."

Publius Ovidius Naso (Ovid)

On Tuesday, the United States will inaugurate a very popular man to the presidency. He's had a few detractors that we will simply refer to as the usual suspects, but overall he's gotten press better than I expect Christ to get at the Second Coming. I hope he pulls of really big things. He has a lot to live up to.

Let's hope nobody gets hurt in this party atmosphere. I'll be safely locked away at home.




Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Change We Can Believe In apparently includes a new bedskirt and settee in the master bedroom...

settee change.jpeg


"Scratch a conservative and you find someone who prefers the past over any future. Scratch a liberal and find a closet aristocrat."

God Emperor of Dune (1981) by Frank Herbert

The Obamas have secured Michael S. Smith as interior decorator to redecorate the private rooms of the White House. This is a good move for a person who fancies himself a man of the people. That is, if 'the people' are Steven Spielberg, Dustin Hoffman, and Cindy Crawford.

The champion of The Change We Need really needs to break away from this up to $100,000 stipend every four years for redecorating. Hey, if he doesn't take it, he doesn't have to pay taxes on it. Why doesn't the president join us in the austerity this economy has brought upon us.

obama dialog balloon empty.jpeg


Now that would be an example of change we can believe in. I want Obama to eliminate all the Washington bull, not embrace it. Guess that's not going to happen.

Obama is currently enjoying superstar popularity. I guess this move fits after all.




Technorati Tags:
, , , , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Do not go gentle into that good night...

Dylan Thomas is a fine poet, or so people say. I have no particular taste for poetry. I have no issues with him but some people should really ignore his advice. I know the poem is about death. In this particular case, I will apply this phrase to political death as I am not interested in wishing physical death on anyone.

The following people should ignore this advice and allow themselves to sink into obscurity. They should do it quietly. They should take whatever joy they wish from their time in the limelight and accept that they have had their full portion and not seek more.

George W. Bush

You've been president for eight years now. Very soon you will be moving out of one of the coolest houses in the world. Spend your last few days enjoying the amenities of the White House. Have very complicated dishes. Take a joyride in Marine One. Then go on to do what most presidents wisely did. Disappear from the national scene altogether. We should not hear from you for many years until your hopefully peaceful passing at which point you are entitled to a kickass state funeral.

Sarah Palin

You had your chance. You blew it. You have become the poster child for the benefits of doing your homework the night before. There is nothing to be served by staying on the national stage. There is just too much file footage that your apologists can't explain away. The only reason that the Republican party would run you against Obama is...

1. He's so popular that they just don't want to put a lot of effort into 2012.

2. He really is the risen Messiah and he has been declared king.

3. The economy shows no sign of turning around and they're going to let the democrats take the heat for four more years.

4. Everyone else has come to their senses and decided that politics is a game for liars and white collar criminals and have chosen a more noble profession like...well...any other legal activity that one engages in to make a living.

Ruth Marcus

Anyone who talks like this shouldn't be in a Cabinet position. She should be teaching master classes in appearing before senate subcommittees.

Arne Duncan

The Department of Education should go as I discussed in a previous post. We can start with you.




Technorati Tags:
, , , , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

When you ought to get a little help from a friend...

This blog is going to get tricky. Very soon the risen Lord and savior will become our sitting president. I'm going to have to be cautious. Fortunately nobody really reads this blog anyway. I'm still going to be cautious in case someone does.

Obama's choice for Treasury Secretary, Timothy F. Geithner, apparently made some errors in filing is federal income taxes. He's paid the back taxes and the penalties and all is forgiven. I'm happy for him. I hope things go as well with me if I ever run afoul of the IRS.

We exist in a political world where as soon as someone is nominated for anything, there is a witch hunt in which any little piece of dirt is found and put under a huge magnifying glass so that it can be all out of proportion. Sometimes the concerns are valid. Sometimes they are not. Geithner has a valid concern but not the one that his opponents are trumpeting.

I don't think Geithner is a tax cheat. I really don't think he was trying to evade paying what the law stipulated he owed in taxes. I honestly believe he made a boo boo on his 1040 or whatever of the myriad forms on which he blew it.

Here's my problem: He's slated to be the Treasury Secretary. One of his responsibilities is formulating and recommending tax policy to the president. I do not want a person formulating tax policy to recommend to the president who isn't smart enough to say, "I have a complicated tax situation. Perhaps I should hire someone who specializes in such things to manage my finances." Many people do.

I don't expect a Treasury Secretary to have perfect knowledge of the tax code. The president has advisors, one will likely be Geithner unfortunately. He will have people to advise him. He should have had one a few years ago.

Oh, and for crying out loud, hire a nanny from a service.

One wonders why these issues crop up with nominees. The answer is simple. Politicians are fundamentally flawed creatures. If you are interested in working for one closely, you must also be a fundamentally flawed creature.




Technorati Tags:
, , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Selling your soul to the devil...

Primary Colors.jpg


I saw the movie Primary Colors again this afternoon. The movie is more poignant now than it was when it was released in 1998. Now we don't have to wonder about how much John Travolta was trying to be a caricature of Clinton. I don't care. There need be no more discussion about just how much Emma Thompson was trying to look like Hillary Clinton. It doesn't matter. Now the truth in the movie can stand on its own and those who liked Clinton need no longer be offended because it is sufficiently separated by time.

Watching Emma Thompson explain to Kathy Bates why they had to compromise their values after talking the whole movie about not running a negative campaign and release the dirt they had found on Larry Hagman showed a truth of American politics. If you want to succeed in politics, you have to sell your soul to the devil. The points she made about the republicans or the press outing it if they didn't doesn't make her case. It just proves that republicans and democrats are ladles dipped from the same barrel of sludge.

But Stanton didn't leak the information to the press. He gave the only copy to Picker.

That was touching but irrelevant. The minute Libby was sent on her way to find the information, the contract was signed. Giving it to Picker instead of the press just goes to prove a politician can't even keep a promise to the Lord of the Underworld.

Seeing Henry standing and shaking hands with Stanton at the Inaugural Ball was just sad.




Technorati Tags:
, , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Middle East Conflict, part MMMCCXCVII...

Israel.jpg


Reading about the conflict in the Middle East is a mind boggling experience. It seems that too many people are trying to confuse the issue. The issue is really very simple. God made the region holy to too many different people who don't like each other all that much. I've done some digging down into the history of the region. The history is even more confusing than news agencies want to make the conflict to be. Since I wasn't interested in putting too much effort into the study, I decided that my primary source would be Scholastic Magazine. Since their audience is children, I figured that the read wouldn't be too taxing. The timeline of the region they wrote up was pretty interesting. Not only was it interesting, but it met my requirement of being not too taxing mentally.

The most telling part of the history is that the two people who really want to control it has spent very little time or never controlling it. Prior to the creation of the state of Israel, it was a British Mandate. Before that, it was the Ottomans. Before that, it was the Arab Caliphs. Before that, it was the Byzantine Empire. Before that, it was the Romans. You get the idea. The Holy to too many people Land is one of the great world crossroads. It has spent most of its history under the control of some distant or not so terribly distant empire builder.

The big mistake was actually giving it to one of the groups that consider it holy. My solution to this problem is simple. Give it to a neutral party that will turn the place into that which the peacemakers haven't even aspired.

Holy Land Disney.jpg


Yes, yes, I know. Euro Disney was the joke of its time. Well, I think this could be a real hit. Think about what the region is like now. Who better than Disney to make it into what everyone would really like it to be...The Happiest Place on Earth.




Technorati Tags:
, , , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Friday, January 9, 2009

A plea for veracity shouted into the uncaring wind...

The talking heads are missing the point. None of the talking heads disagree that some of what Obama is promising as tax cuts are going to people who don't pay taxes. They'll receive larger subsidy checks from the government. One side calls it welfare. The other side keeps explaining why they need these subsidy checks.

I don't know whether welfare is the right term or not. I don't know who they are, so I don't know if they need larger subsidy checks or not. That's another discussion and not relevant to my point.

Here's my point...

A tax cut reduces the level of tax one pays. If one does not pay taxes, then one cannot receive a tax cut. Instead of calling your plan a, "tax cut plan," our useless politicians could say, "we have a plan that will reduce taxes for some and will provide larger subsidies for others." It's longer and has more syllables but it does have the benefit of being the truth.

I know why our delightful politicians don't do this. They're liars by nature. They call the entire plan a tax cut leaving out portions of the truth because it will look better in a headline in the New York Times or someone's RSS feed. Things change. They also remain the same.

If you are waiting for a new era in politics, you have been given ample warning that you aren't going to get one.




Technorati Tags:
, ,





Technorati Tags:


Sphere: Related Content

When Andy Warhol said everyone will have 15 minutes of fame, that was apparently an average...

joe the plumber.jpgJoe the Plumber, whose 15 minutes were more than expended during the 2008 presidential campaign, is headed to the Middle East to become a war correspondent. He says he's going there to deliver the Israeli perspective. I think I've heard an adequate amount of both sides of that argument from the boring media. I won't hear what he says unless Stewart or Colbert report on him because I'm just not that curious.



What isn't being reported on are the others that are going to the Middle East to provide their unique perspective.



bob the builder.jpgBob the Builder will be reporting on the effects of rockets and mortars on the buildings. He'll be lending a hand in the reconstruction effort. He's going to go against the grain and build quick with cheap materials because the stuff he builds will only need to last a week or so until the next rocket, or mortar, or car bomb, or whatever knocks it down again.



dora the explorer.jpgDora the Explorer will be going there on a peace mission. By teaching them basic Spanish expressions, along with math skills and music in a very interactive environment, she might get the two sides to finally come together in peace. If not, the answer to peace in the Middle East is probably floating around somewhere in that backpack of hers.



thomas the tank engine.jpgThomas the Tank Engine will be on the scene. He won't be doing much as there is not an overabundance of railroad tracks in the region.








vlad the impaler.jpgHopefully we won't have to hear much about Joe the Plumber's antics in the Middle East. If we do, I'm going to suggest that we send somebody to interview him. I'd like it to be another FIRST NAME + THE + DESCRIPTIVE WORD(S). I think the person who would be best suited to this task would be Vlad the Impaler.




Technorati Tags:
, , , , ,


Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

The senate is headed in the right direction...

There are two pieces of good news in regards to the U.S. Senate.

1. Thanks to the issues in Minnesota and Illinois, only 98 senators were sworn into office today. That's two down and 98 more to go. Too bad that these issues will likely be resolved and the Senate will once again balloon to the way too large 100 again.

2. You know, a lot of bad things come out of Washington because, you know, the senators, well, you know, talk too much. You know, if we had someone with, you know, great, like, you know, oratorical skills like, you know, Caroline Kennedy, you know, a lot less would, you know, happen. That would be, you know, great.





Technorati Tags:
,


Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, January 3, 2009

What I'd like to see from our government in the year 2009...

I think it is high time that our federal government aspires to be better than the rest of us, just like too many other people think it is. If you don't understand what I mean, read my previous post on the subject. Right now, it's no better than the rest of us. The government wants to spend more money than it is taking in via taxes. Their answer to this is the same as a lot of people. They whip out the plastic. That's part of the reason our economy is in its current state. Too many people are carrying too much debt. The only difference between us and the government is that we don't have a big tote board displaying our total debt.

Here's a list of things our government can do to save money. This is not an exhaustive list. It's just a start.

START THE SALARY CUTS AT THE TOP

The president makes too much money. He's already getting free room and board and all the free transportation he can consume. Anyone else who has a bunch of freebies should endure the same cuts.

NO MORE FREE HEALTHCARE

Representatives and Senators should buy their own health care. Lots of people who make less money than them buy their own. The health care they buy for themselves isn't always great but perhaps it will be a motivator for the health care reform so many are crying for and are not going to get as long as those who represent us have health care that the rest of us can only dream of having.

SAY GOOD-BYE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF WHAT THE HELL DO THEY DO ANYWAY?

Eliminate the Department of Commerce. Its function is currently being carried out in something the politicians in Washington will never let go of, pork barrel spending. Since we've never been able to be rid of it (not like we ever really tried) and the Congress-type-people are already there, might just as well save some money and just get rid of the whole department. Sorry, Bill but you're doing a fine job in your current position.

SAY GOOD-BYE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLENTY OF CHILDREN STILL LEFT BEHIND

Eliminate the Department of Education. If you don't like No Child Left Behind, and plenty don't and with good reason, then kill it by cutting off its head. According to the Department of Education website, their mission is sevenfold:

a) Strengthen the Federal commitment to assuring access to equal educational opportunity for every individual;

b) Supplement and complement the efforts of states, the local school systems and other instrumentalities of the states, the private sector, public and private nonprofit educational research institutions, community-based organizations, parents, and students to improve the quality of education;

c) Encourage the increased involvement of the public, parents, and students in Federal education programs;

d) Promote improvements in the quality and usefulness of education through Federally supported research, evaluation, and sharing of information;

e) Improve the coordination of Federal education programs;

f) Improve the management of Federal education activities; and

g) Increase the accountability of Federal education programs to the President, the Congress, and the public.

I will translate these for you:

a) Making sure the Federal government is committed to saying they'll do what they've already said they're doing so we can look busy and have a job.

b) Making us look busy so we can have a job. And someone dare to tell me that 'b' isn't a bunch of mission statement non-speak.

c) Making people interested in keeping us around so we can have a job.

d) Publish a bunch of statistics so we look busy and can have a job.

e) Talk to a bunch of people so we can look busy and have a job.

f) See letter 'e'.

g) Increasing our level of responsibilities so that we can look busy and have a job.

JOHN STEWART PUT ME ON TO THIS ONE

Ditch the Department of Transportation. I think John Stewart put it best in his book, America. I am paraphrasing because I only have the audiobook and don't have a print version to reference.

The Department of Transportation is one of the cabinet posts that allow you to make your cabinet look like America.

Seen a car?

Seen a plane?

Hispanic?

Want a job in my cabinet?

SPEND MONEY LIKE IRRESPONSIBLE CHILDREN? BE TREATED LIKE IRRESPONSIBLE CHILDREN.

Every line item in the Federal budget must include a layman's explanation of just what the hell the money is being spent on anyway.

I could go on but I've spent enough time on things that will never happen.




Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , , , ,


Sphere: Related Content